Rohit Sharma explodes the Indian commentators, called “paid agenda”

One of the most beloved cricket players in the game, however Rohit Sharma was not fortified against criticism by critics, cricket players or former journalists. India’s ODI captain has been part of some fiery press conferences, especially since he took over the role of the captain of the national team. In the last stage of his career, Rohit pointed out a major change he saw in the way to run the cricket. In an interview, the 38 -year -old highlighted how “Masala” took over the “pure cricket” in the modern era.

During an interview with Valm KumarRohit highlighted the size of the big difference between the type of comment he sees in India compared to what he sees in Australia, describing the former as the previous “disappointment”.

“We see everything, we are talking to each other. Sometimes when we watch the match on TV, the type of things that commentators talk about is very different from the type of comments you see in Australia. Here, it is very disappointing. I am very honest. They seem just wanting to target a player and talk about it. This is very disappointing,” Rohit said during the interview.

The veteran mixture, which recently resigned from the Cricket game test, said that the player in a weak form is completely understood, but commentators must know where the line was drawn.

“There are a lot of people who love the game. They don’t want” Masala “, and they want to watch the cricket game. In today’s times, we put a lot of masala in the game. There are cricket lovers who also want to learn more about the game, and we understand that there is any of the forms of the player. The cups deserve great respect.

Rohit even feels that at times of the day, the “agenda” that relies on the agenda on real reactions to the player’s performance or lack of performance.

“Yes, there were things that had come out of our hands. We did not do a good job in some cases, as we deserve criticism. No problem. We lost to New Zealand at home, and we deserve criticism. But there is a way to criticize someone.

Rohit also said that he does not believe in defending himself because of criticism, because the “attack” is what is good in it.

“To deal with criticism is important in the life of the athlete. I understand it. But, it is not necessary to be against him. Such things did not need. The field, not outside.”