There is a large loophole in the rules of the Cricket game when it comes to decision review system (DRS). The defect during the Indians match in Mumbai against Royal Chalnars Bengaloro in the Indian Premier League 2025 on Monday. The accident occurred on the last ball from the RCB roles. Mi Pacer Jasprit Bumrah Bowned a Yorker to RCB’s Jitesh Sharma. The mixture was absent, and a pillow beaten. The referee raised his finger to the attractiveness of the Mi players, but Jitesh, who had assumed a position, decided to climb to the upper floor.
Return operations revealed that the ball was outside the outside and the effect was also out. Since then, Gytech offered a shot, which has been announced not to leave the third ruling. It is worth noting that if he had not shown the shot, the ball line would have been dropped after the position of influence.
While Gytech was not eventually given, RCB was rejected from running due to the base of the cricket. It should be noted that the ball is considered dead as soon as the ground referee rules. Now, even if running comes after that, it will not be considered. This is why RCB has not been given the last song.
Hanoma Pharari, the Indian mixture outside.
He wrote on Twitter previously: “The need to change the base,” he wrote on Twitter previously.
You need to change the base.
If you see the last ball of RCB roles, Jitesh was introduced in the field and it was reviewed and UMPIRE was forced to veto its decision because the effect was outside the trunk. The problem is that the extent will not be counted, if the judgment does not give it, …– Hanuma Vihari (Hanumavihari) April 7, 2025
“If you see the last ball from the RCB roles, Jitesh was presented on the field and was reviewed, and the referee had to turn his decision because the effect was outside the trunk. The problem is that running will not be calculated, if UMPIRE did not give it, the tour was calculated.
“What if the second roles and 2 are required of one ball? The result of the match was determined by the referee’s decision. Food for thought?”
Topics mentioned in this article